Stage 1 of 5
Validate
Is this a real problem for a customer you can reach, who wants it solved?
Gate: Stop here.Tasks in this stage
10 of 16 done
- ✓Describe who has the problem and what it is
- ✓Log your first conversation
- ○Record your visitors, signups and result
- + 13 more
What the founder did: talked to 12 people who had lent to or borrowed from family in the past two years. 10 had nothing in writing, and 5 said it had caused a falling-out. 8 liked the idea of an app tracking repayments. Asked about pooling money into a shared fund that the app holds, only 3 were comfortable with it.
What the guide flagged: the design has the app holding a family's pooled money and moving it between members. In the US, that is money transmission, which needs a license in almost every state, each with its own bond and audits. Charging interest adds state lending rules on top. These are conditions for operating at all, not paperwork to sort out after launch.
Why No-go: the heart of the idea, an app that holds a family's money and collects repayments with interest, needs money transmitter licenses state by state and compliance with lending laws before the first dollar moves. That takes lawyers, bonds and capital far beyond $2,500. A version that only tracks IOUs avoids the wall, but it's a different idea and needs its own Validate.
The regulatory wall
Holding and moving other people's money is money transmission: a license in nearly every state, each with a surety bond and audits. Lending with interest adds state lending and usury rules on top.